Dependency management

Collaboration in large-scale organisations often reveals friction in places teams expect to run smoothly. As product and development functions scale, the number of moving parts increases. So does the risk of misalignment.

At Easy Agile, conversations with our customers frequently surface familiar challenges. While each organisation is unique, the core struggles of collaboration are shared. To protect the privacy of the teams we spoke to, we’ve anonymised all quotes. But every insight is real, direct from the people doing the work.

This post is for anyone navigating the complexity of scaled collaboration, whether you're leading a team or working within one. Sometimes the hardest part is seeing the problem clearly. These are the patterns teams are running into, the questions they’re wrestling with, and the cracks that emerge when planning, alignment, and communication break down. Understanding and acknowledging these issues is the first step toward solving them.

Here’s what teams are experiencing and the key questions they’re grappling with as they scale collaboration.

TL;DR – Common collaboration challenges in scale-ups and enterprises:

• Teams struggle with communication and alignment, especially when working across multiple teams or departments
• Managing cross-team dependencies is a significant challenge, often causing delays and requiring frequent coordination
• Capacity planning and skill allocation are difficult, particularly when teams have to balance project work with ongoing operational tasks
• Teams face challenges in breaking down work effectively and maintaining visibility of progress across different teams
• Frequent changes in priorities and scope creep disrupt team planning and execution
• There are difficulties in translating high-level strategy into actionable team priorities and objectives
• Teams struggle with effective retrospectives and continuous improvement processes

What breaks down in cross-team communication?

Communication challenges tend to intensify with scale. As soon as multiple teams are involved, misalignment becomes more likely. A Senior Product Manager from a global HR tech firm described a pattern many teams will recognise:

"One of the main themes I heard in conversations with leadership was the lack of process, transparency, visibility, and dependency tracking. It’s always been manual across teams. We’ve done a really good job, but there’s an opportunity to do better."

Another team member highlighted how this disconnect tends to grow over time:

"At the start of each quarter, our conversations are strategic and cross-functional, involving sales and strategy teams. But as we dive deeper into execution, communication shrinks down to daily engineering huddles, and essential alignment details often get lost."

The problem isn't a lack of communication, but rather a shift in its focus. When delivery takes centre stage, strategic context gets sidelined. When teams move into execution mode, that shift in communication cadence creates blind spots across departments, leading to confusion, duplicated work, or misaligned outputs.

Why is managing dependencies across teams so difficult?

Dependencies create friction when they aren’t visible or clearly owned. Coordination across teams can be derailed by unclear sequencing, late handovers, or competing timelines. An Agile Coach at a financial institution shared:

"We had to run bi-weekly cross-program dependency calls just to stay on top of what was blocking who. We just list dependencies manually, there isn’t any unified visibility. At the ART level, it’s a mix of RTEs, Scrum Masters, and team members trying to link things, but beyond that, it falls apart"

A delivery leader at a global credit bureau reinforced the limitations of existing tools:

"I’ve never successfully been able to really tackle dependency visualization and put a process around that. It's always been manual. When I'm speaking to an executive, that means something... But when I'm speaking to someone on an agile team, it changes as it rolls up...Without proper plugins, even a robust tool like Jira struggles to provide clear dependency visuals. Planning becomes complicated quickly, leaving teams stuck."

Dependency risk increases when shared work isn’t tracked or visualised in a way that’s accessible to all stakeholders. Teams need to see not just their own work, but how it connects with others. Teams need more than awareness - they need shared visibility, clarity on ownership, and consistent ways to plan around dependencies.

How do teams manage capacity when demands keep shifting?

Planning team capacity isn’t just about headcount, but also about competing demands. Teams are often asked to deliver roadmap initiatives while supporting legacy systems, resolving production issues, or addressing technical debt. A product leader from a cybersecurity company shared:

"We’re always trying to achieve a lot with limited resources, and it makes roadmapping really difficult. We’ve made progress in estimating the team's bandwidth more accurately by looking at what they actually delivered last quarter. But we still hit the same issue - too many topics, too little time."

Another team shared how they introduced tighter prioritisation controls using a third-party tool, but even rigid structures have their limits:

"We use XXX as a source of truth for prioritisation. We have around 80 different initiatives prioritised from 1 to 80 of importance... no meeting can be scheduled if the project is not approved in the tool."

This helped formalise approvals and reduce noise, but it also revealed a deeper issue. Even with a strict gating process, the volume of initiatives stayed high, and prioritisation alone couldn’t solve for limited capacity. Clearer structures don’t automatically reduce the demand on teams or ease delivery expectations. That tension persists unless strategic scope is also narrowed.

What makes work breakdown and visibility so hard to maintain?

Breaking down initiatives into independent, testable stories is not always straightforward, especially when scope is uncertain or spans months. A software engineer working across multiple teams explained:

"Breaking work down is hard - some teams still think in layers. They say, ‘This only delivers value when the whole thing’s done.’ On top of that, we often run big planning in a five-hour day or stretch it awkwardly over two days. Third parties and shared services don’t get folded into teams, which makes breakdown and clarity harder."

Large epics often outlive the context in which they were created. As scope evolves, teams may struggle to maintain clear acceptance criteria and shared understanding.

An Agile Coach reinforced how hard it is to keep sight of progress:

"We break each story into smaller pieces as much as possible where it's testable by itself so the testing team can test it... But if it’s a lengthy project, spanning more than two months, it’s easy to lose clarity and effectiveness...Consistently tracking actions across multiple sprints involves endless toggling. It's difficult to quickly understand what's truly improving and what’s still stuck."

As work grows more complex, clarity suffers. Without reliable visibility, work risks stalling or repeating unnecessarily. Teams need tools, systems, and shared language to ensure breakdowns don’t get lost in the shuffle and progress remains meaningful.

Why do changing priorities and scope creep derail plans?

Frequent priority changes and scope creep disrupt planning discipline. They often signal deeper issues: vague goals, shifting leadership expectations, or unclear ownership. One product leader summed it up:

"Priorities used to switch constantly - sometimes halfway through a project, we’d have 30% done and then get pulled into something else. That context-switching really hurts. It demoralises engineers who were already deep into a feature. We had to raise it in a full engineering and product retrospective just to get some stability."

Another shared the toll it takes on delivery teams:

"We often found ourselves mid-quarter pivoting to newly emerging business needs, without fully aligning on what gets dropped. That lack of clarity meant engineers felt whiplash, and team goals kept shifting."

Without stable anchors in the form of clear goals and boundaries, even well-planned work can unravel. Work, then, expands to fill the available sprint, regardless of long-term impact, which brings us to the next challenge.

What stops teams from aligning strategy to daily work?

Teams need clear goals. But clarity breaks down when strategic objectives are too broad or when every team interprets them differently. A senior product manager explained:

"Prioritisation is only as good as your strategy, and ours wasn’t clear. The business goal was just ‘grow revenue,’ but what does that mean? Acquisition? Retention? Everyone wrote their own product objectives. It became a bit of a free-for-all. When goals are vague, it’s hard to prioritise work that ladders up to anything concrete."

Another added:

"We all set objectives tied to broad company goals, but when those goals lack precision, our objectives become misaligned, making prioritisation difficult and often inconsistent."

Without alignment between leadership priorities and team-level execution, valuable work can feel directionless. Objectives become outputs rather than outcomes.

What holds back meaningful retrospectives?

Retrospectives are intended to surface learning. But without consistent follow-through, they risk becoming routine. One Agile Coach shared how to keep them practical:

"We’ve tried tools where you just send a link and everyone rates how hard it was to get something done. But too often, it ends up with one person speaking and everyone else just agreeing. We’re trying to avoid the loudest voice dominating the retro. It’s still a challenge to get real, reflective conversations."

Another shared the risk of retro fatigue:

"To track action items consistently isn't easy... I have to toggle down and look at each one, which can make things cumbersome when ensuring certain behaviours have stuck...Effective retrospectives should surface recurring issues, not just review the recent past. Discussing ongoing challenges helps teams proactively tackle problems and move forward."

The barrier is rarely the ceremony - it’s the follow-up. Teams need lightweight ways to track retro actions, validate changes, and revisit unresolved pain points.

Where to focus

Improving collaboration means addressing the systems and habits that hold teams back:

• Keep strategic conversations active, not just at quarterly planning.
• Visualise and track cross-team dependencies clearly.
• Protect capacity for both roadmap work and operational stability.
• Break work into testable, clearly defined pieces.
• Reinforce the connection between business goals and delivery priorities.
• Make retrospective actions visible and measurable.

The teams we speak to aren’t struggling because they lack process. They’re navigating complexity. The opportunity lies in simplifying where it matters and supporting teams with the clarity to make progress, together.

The first step is recognising these patterns and giving them language. When teams can see and name the problem, they’re already on the path to solving it.

How Easy Agile can help

Whether you're dealing with blurred dependencies, vague objectives or sprint volatility, Easy Agile offers three purpose-built solutions to help teams stay aligned:

• Easy Agile Programs brings structure and visibility to cross-team planning in Jira. Perfect for managing dependencies and long-range planning across multiple teams and projects.
• Easy Agile Roadmaps gives every team a simple, shared timeline view, so they can prioritise and sequence work with strategic context.
• Easy Agile TeamRhythm makes sprint planning, story mapping, and retrospectives more engaging and purposeful, turning agile ceremonies into actionable, team-owned progress.

Success for agile software teams revolves around collaboration, flexibility, and efficiency. Whether you're a coach or Release Train Engineer supporting multiple teams, or a scrum master or engineer aiming for improvement within your team, honing your dependency management skills will boost efficiency and productivity.

While dependencies often seem like hurdles, here's an insight: they can be a powerful strategic tool to enhance your agile team's performance. In this post, we'll explore how you can leverage dependencies to guide your team towards greater efficiency and success.

Agile Team Autonomy

At the heart of agile is the concept of autonomy and self-management. It's all about empowering teams to own the end-to-end delivery of their work with minimal dependencies. This means optimizing their workflow rather than relying on other teams to deliver value to users. When teams need to depend on others, the flow of work becomes less predictable.

In larger, more complex companies, dependencies are often unavoidable due to the sheer size and intricacy of systems. The real challenge is transforming these dependencies into opportunities for improvement rather than roadblocks. By improving the visibility of these dependencies, teams can better understand them, prioritize and sequence work effectively and manage delivery planning and execution more efficiently.

More than one-third of agile teams report that team silos and the delays that result are a problem

17th State of Agile Report, Digital.AI

Dependency visualization

Improving the visibility of dependencies starts with open communication and transparency. When team members are comfortable sharing their tasks and challenges, you create a culture of trust and collaboration. This transparency is critical for identifying dependencies early and managing them effectively.

Software that allows teams to map out dependencies clearly can be a great tool for improving the visibility of work, making it easier to track their status and plan accordingly. Regularly updating and reviewing the dependencies you've mapped keeps everyone on the same page and helps you anticipate potential bottlenecks before they occur.

Easy Agile TeamRhythm is a user-friendly app that integrates seamlessly with Jira to support team planning, which includes visualizing dependencies. You can display dependencies by type and risk, and see dependencies both within your team and with other teams.

Dependency Patterns

Once you're able to see dependencies clearly, you might recognize patterns forming. These dependency patterns can show where a team is relying too heavily or too dependent on another team to deliver work.

Consistent bottlenecks highlight opportunities for improvement, like a change in team composition. When you notice these patterns, it's essential to reassess and implement strategies to become more self-reliant, ensuring a smoother flow of work and improved delivery timelines.

Prioritizing and Sequencing Work

Once dependencies are identified and made visible, you can improve the flow of work by organizing tasks in a sequence that avoids work being delayed by other tasks. Not all tasks carry the same weight or urgency, and understanding the critical path—the sequence of tasks that determines the fastest time to deliver value—can help focus efforts where they are needed most.

Sequencing work thoughtfully ensures that dependent tasks are tackled in the right order, minimizing delays and rework. This strategic approach to task management not only enhances team efficiency but also supports a smoother workflow and avoids delivery being derailed at the last minute.

Better Collaboration

By identifying and visualizing dependencies, you spot bottlenecks early, re-prioritize tasks, and manage delivery plans effectively. More importantly, it empowers your team to take complete ownership of their tasks while constantly improving their workflows.

Remember, every dependency is a piece of a larger puzzle that holds the potential to boost your team's efficiency. By understanding and managing these dependencies proactively, you can ensure smoother workflows, fewer roadblocks, and a highly efficient agile team.

‍

How organized are your Jira boards? On the scale of “well-thought-user-stories-beautifully-prioritized-by-customer-value” to “the-digital-equivalent-of-a-90’s-era-laminate-desk-cluttered-by-sticky-notes-and-old-coffee-cups”, where do yours sit?

It might be time to find a tool to help you whip your Jira issues into shape. And the best way to keep things in shape is to visualize the work in one place.

Read on for tips and to see how Easy Agile TeamRhythm helps you prioritize work effectively.

Visual task management

Put simply, when you can see something clearly, it’s easier to understand and manage. Enter: visual task management.

Visual task management uses boards to display and track work, which can give you a view of complex project tasks that makes it easier to comprehend.

For those of us who work in Jira, well yes we can see our epics, stories and tasks on the screen, but it isn’t always clear how they relate to each other.

That’s where a tool like a User Story Map, such as the one in Easy Agile TeamRhythm, offers so much value.

Get to the benefits

Giving yourself the ability to visualize your work comes with a long list of benefits. When your whole team can see the work laid out before them, communication is easier and teamwork can improve.

1. Consistent communication

Local and remote teams can see the same view of work from any location. Epics across the backbone with linked issues lined up beneath. When work is added or changed, you still have a central source of truth that is shared by everyone, no matter where they’re located.

2. A time-saving tool

Sprint or version planning is quick and easy when team members have all the information they need in a single view. Planning is much easier when initiatives, epics, user stories and subtasks along with story points and goals, can all be seen in one place.

Easy Agile TeamRhythm provides this all-in-one view, along with the ability to create and estimate new issues on the story map, and sequence them with drag and drop. Easy.

3. Avoid unexpected roadblocks

Ever had a release derailed by an unexpected dependency? For a smooth and dependable release, you need visibility of issues that are dependent on others.

We’ve made it easy to visualize the dependencies between issues on the TeamRhythm User Story Map, so you can avoid unexpected delays and keep delivering value to your customers.

You can choose to see dependencies between issues that are on the same board (internal dependencies), and where one issue is on another board (external dependencies). This gives you a clear picture of how work should be prioritized so that you avoid roadblocks and manage delays before they become a problem.

Read more: Dependency lines on the TeamRhythm User Story Map >>

4. Productivity increases

Working life is better when you can see how your contribution makes a difference. When everyone in the team can see how their work is important, and ideas for how to do things better start to flow, that’s when you start smashing your goals.

We’ve designed Easy Agile TeamRhythm to help teams focus on continuous improvement. That is something for everyone to get excited about because the team leads with their ideas for how they can make their working life better. Turn those ideas into Jira issues in just a few clicks so you can put things into action in the very next sprint.

TeamRhythm helps you see what to do first

Laid out clearly in a User Story Map format, with the ability to overlay a map of dependency lines, TeamRhythm makes it really clear which issues need to be tackled first to make sure that you can keep delivering for your customers.

Everyone in the team has an instant view of their priorities. Communication is streamlined. Collaboration is simplified and productivity increases. Doesn’t that sound great?!

Watch a demo, learn about pricing, and try for yourself in our sandbox. Visit the Easy Agile TeamRhythm Features and Pricing page for more.

Easy Agile TeamRhythm

KEY FEATURES